Monday, July 17, 2006

Mix Religion, Politics; Watch World War III Start

Imran Anwar states his position on religion and politics, and where Muslims, Jews and Christians are playing with fire. Don't miss the part about George W. Bush having visions of being a prophet of God, while Zionazis kill Christians and Muslims in Lebanon and Palestine. Even evil, corrupt, Arab dictators are being more fair and balanced than the USA government and media.

Listen and comment!

Imran

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

First, a little suggestion: Why don't you start calling the global war on terrorism as "World War III" already?

Calling it "World War III" has a catchier death-ring to it. When people hear or read it in your future podcasts / commentaries, they're more likely to think, "Whoa, War No.3. Gotta do something---we shouldv'e stopped at War No. 2."

Anyway...

I think my previous comments (in the other topic) can still be applied to what you said in your podcast. I'll just summarize them here:

1.) Rather than forcibly implement democracy (whoa, contradiction in terms), perhaps the US should try re-establishing an Islamic state in both Iraq and Afghanistan, using hand-picked moderates.

2.) Perhaps it's high time Islam had a major philo-theological movement from within, focused on redefining what a MODERN MUSLIM STATE is -- something every Muslim can respect and everyone can help implement.

3.) Perhaps it's high time Israel rethought its Zionist ideals. Does the Jewish faith really need a nation-state to survive?

4.) What if Israel took its cue from the Catholic Church's Vatican City-State? What if Israel became a token miniature state set in a small area instead, but retained U.N. representation and political clout, enough to protect Jews around the world forevermore? (Like the way the Vatican is powerful.) That way Israel gets to stay in Palestine, and the displaced Muslim Palestinians get their land back.

All this would probably work. But then there's the matter of satisfying US interests. (Throw in that monkey wrench and the entire collection of ideas comes crashing down.) The US must remain in control of the Middle East, if it is to control the oil and remain the most powerful country on Earth. A mini-"Israel City" and "stubbornly" Islamic states makes the US nervous.

Unfortunately, I can't yet think of a good idea to counterbalance the US. Er...water-powered cars from China, anyone?

FRANCES BILLANO
Manila, Philippines

IMRAN™ said...

As usual, impressive and entertaining comments from you.

Imran

blogagog said...

Mine wasn't impressive or entertaining? :(

IMRAN™ said...

Hehehe, this one would have been :-) ... except, you had posted your comment at this page and I replied there. :-)

Imran

blogagog said...

Darn, I meant to cross-post my message. But it disappeared into the 'approval' thing. Nevertheless, I commend you for allowing dissent on your blog.

Joe said...

My comment is simple.
Israel is doing what is good for Israel and the US. The two are simbiotic due to the economy. Look at how much of the NASDAQ is Israel.

Second, Hezbolla can only fight as cowards if they hope to win anything. The Hezbolla muslim leaders will be defeated simply because its the right thing to do.
Everyone dies, all civilians will die. Not necessarily right away, but it happens to all of us.

And yes the US supplies Israel with stuff, and Israel actually have companies that have invented drugs, and new technologies that the US is able to use.

Did you buy one of those computer memory chips that is USB related, that was invented in Israel. Do you happen to be using XP right now? (Israel again).
Israel has earned a right to be free from Terror groups such as Hezbolla. And that is why this will end much better than it started.

Meanwhile in war, people die.
Regards

Anonymous said...

Imran,I've finally disagree with you on an issue. I do not think Hizbollah should be disarmed,if they do, the Israelis will treat the Lebonese the same way they treat the Palestinians.

Anonymous said...

Do you think Kofi Anan would get more respect if he was a white man ??

IMRAN™ said...

Response to 2 "Anonymous" comments above:

#1. You will not disagree as much if you see what I mean... Disarming Hezbollah does not mean leaving the area free of any viable resistance to the Zionist thugs. Lebanon should have its own solid military made of Christians, Muslims, etc. not just a Shiite militia... and they need an Air Force. When was the last time you saw Israel or America attack a country with a real functioning Air Force? Somalia? Afghanistan? Iraq? Lebanon?

#2. Yes & No. Kofi Annan as a smart though often weak and sometimes incompetent and even possibly corrupt man, WOULD get more respect if he was White instead of Black... BUT, just being White is not enough. Look at George W. Bush... he could barely spell R-E-S-P-E-C-T, much less earn it.

Imran

IMRAN™ said...

This is a response to "Joe". Joe, are you sure you're not related to George W. Bush? Your "logic" is astounding, in its absurdity. If "in war people die" is the criteria, I guess we should just expect the same logic to apply to the 3000 that died at the World Trade Center? Civilians die, as you said, so what's the big deal?

And, you give Israel a lot of credit for things. They have done some good work in technology, 90% of that seeded by American ingenuity. Don't forget the US GIVES its secret stuff AND MONEY to Zionistan, but the Zionsts still SPY on America and steal our secrets. There are MORE Jews in American prisons for spying than Communist Russians. How nice that you admire Israel.

Imran

Joe said...

Thanks for the reply.

You have to respect Power. Even though the US "gave" israel power, the Zionist as you call them have in its weaponry 700 nukes ready to launch.

I would much wrather that Israel defeat a little bibe country\town Lebonen, than
blow all the middle east because enough is enough.

What would you wrather have happen?

IMRAN™ said...

Joe, Now you are making me think you are French or something. By your logic, it means you would respect the Nazis if they were in power. You ask what I would rather ("rather", Joe, not "wrather".... that is the George W. Bush school of spelling).... see happen with Israel's 700 nukes... Well, it would be pretty ironic and OK with me if they all blew up in their Israeli storage, killing them, instead of killing others, making that Zionazi occupied land uninhabitable for them for 100,000 years. That would be poetic justice.

Imran

Anonymous said...

Dear G.I. Joe:

Given the youthful smugness of your writing tone, and your consistent misspelling of the words "Lebanon" (Lebonen),"rather" (wrather), and "symbiotic" (simbiotic)...anyone can tell you know zilch about war, young man. If you are a true-blue American, kindly look to Abraham Lincoln or Mark Twain for inspiration, instead of Rambo or Ah-nold.

Yes: in war, people die. But please be wise enough to remember the next casualty could be YOU. If that's like, a total bummer to you, then I hope it makes you realize how important it is for everyone (Hezbollah, Isrealis, USA, etc.) to stop the violence immediately.

To Imran: Whaaat?! Mon Dieu, why you do not like zee French? Zeyr government has a historee of testeeng zeyr nukes in other people's backyards, n'est pas? (LOL.)